The review package deserves a workspace, not a reading marathon.
A due diligence package, a compliance review, a board deck set — the documents arrive together because they answer one question from multiple angles. But the tools available to review them still treat each file as an independent reading assignment.
Search+ holds the complete package in one persistent workspace. Question the documents together. Extract structured findings. Keep every claim connected to its source.
You have read the documents. Where is the structured output?
Professional review is not casual reading. It is the disciplined extraction of specific understanding from a bounded set of sources under time pressure.
Which terms appear in the agreement but not in the memo. What the financial model assumes that the narrative omits. Where two documents describe the same event differently.
The reading itself is necessary. But the deliverable — the structured review, the risk summary, the comparison — is assembled manually after the reading is done, from notes, highlights, and memory.
The documents belong together. The review tool should hold them together.
Add the complete document package — contracts, memos, financial models, presentations, supporting exhibits. Set standing instructions that reflect the engagement's priorities: what to focus on, what to flag, what terminology to use.
Ask questions that span the package:
"Where do the financial projections in the model differ from the narrative in the memo?"
"What representations appear in the agreement that are not addressed by the disclosure schedule?"
"Which documents address cybersecurity practices, and what do they each say?"
Each answer carries inline citations to the source, available section, and supporting excerpt.
A finding you cannot trace to a source is not a finding.
Professional work requires provenance. When a review identifies a risk, the next question is always: "Where does it say that?"
Search+ attaches inline citations to claims. Open a citation to see the source document, available location metadata, and the exact excerpt supporting the finding.
Search+ shows sections and page references when the underlying source provides them. It does not manufacture location data that the document does not contain.
The engagement spans days. The workspace spans them too.
A professional review is rarely completed in a single sitting. New questions arise from prior findings. Additional documents arrive. The scope narrows or expands.
The workspace holds the documents, the conversations, the instructions, and the prior analysis. Return tomorrow and the review is where you left it — the context is not rebuilt from notes.
Start the review with the documents together.
Bring the document package into one workspace. Extract structured findings. Keep the trail to every source.
Start a workspace