The comparison should show its sources, not consume them.
A merged summary tells you what documents collectively suggest. It does not tell you which document said what, where they agree, or where one quietly contradicts another.
Search+ compares claims across selected sources and returns a structured result where each position is attributed to its origin. The sources are preserved, not flattened.
Six reports. One question. No structured way to compare.
The documents sit in the same workspace. They address the same domain. The question is straightforward: where do they agree, and where do they differ?
The usual answer is: read all six, take notes, and assemble the comparison manually. The comparison lives in your head or in a spreadsheet you built by hand. If someone asks where a particular position came from, you search backward through the reports.
Each position stays attached to the source that holds it.
Search+ Deep Analysis in Compare mode examines the selected sources against the question you define. The result distinguishes:
Where sources agree — and on what terms.
Where sources disagree — and how each frames the disagreement.
Where one source addresses a dimension that others do not.
Each finding carries an inline citation connecting it to the specific document, available section, and supporting excerpt. The comparison is the result. The evidence is still reachable.
Merging is not comparing.
A tool that reads six reports and returns one paragraph has merged them. The individual positions are gone. The disagreements are smoothed. The quiet contradictions are invisible.
A comparison preserves the individual voices. Source A says X. Source B says Y. Source C is silent on the question entirely.
Search+ keeps this structure. The goal is not to produce a consensus where none exists. It is to make the positions visible so the professional can evaluate them.
The comparison is the beginning, not the deliverable.
A structured comparison often raises sharper questions. One source assumes growth; another assumes constraint. One omits a dimension the others treat as central.
The workspace holds the comparison, the documents, and the prior conversations. Follow up on the disagreement. Narrow to one document. Ask a question that the comparison surfaced but did not answer.
The work does not end when the comparison is produced. The workspace is where it continues.
Compare the sources. Keep the positions visible.
Bring the documents into one workspace. Define the comparison. Inspect where they agree, disagree, and stay silent.
Start a workspace