Find out which statistics a paper used and what each result means
The statistical analysis subsection tells you which tests and models produced the numbers in the results: the comparison used, the variables adjusted for, how missing data was treated and how multiple outcomes were handled. It is often written in compressed technical language. Ask Search+ "Which statistical methods were used for the main outcome, and what did the model adjust for?" and the answer explains it in plain terms with a citation, so you can read the authors' exact description alongside.
Creating an account needs no payment.
Last updated October 2026
How to read a paper's statistics with Search+
- Upload the paper and its statistical supplement
Detailed model specifications and sensitivity analyses often sit in supplementary material. Add it to the workspace so questions can reach it.
- Start from the main outcome
Ask which analysis produced the primary result, then ask what it adjusted for and what assumptions it relied on. Secondary analyses can wait.
- Ask what each reported value means here
Ask what a specific coefficient, ratio or interval means for this study. The answer explains it from the paper and cites the passage.
Questions to ask about statistical methods
Which statistical test or model was used to analyse the primary outcome?
Which variables were included as covariates or confounders, and why?
How was missing data handled: complete-case analysis, imputation or another method?
Did the authors test many outcomes or subgroups, and did they adjust for multiple comparisons?
Were sensitivity analyses run, and did they change the main result?
What does the reported hazard ratio mean for the comparison in this study?
What to look for in a statistical analysis section
The choice of test depends on the type of outcome and the design, for example continuous versus binary outcomes or paired versus independent groups. The paper should say which it used for each outcome.
A p-value describes how surprising the data would be if there were no real effect. It is not the probability that the finding is true, and it says nothing about the effect's size, so read it beside the estimate and its interval.
Which confounders a model includes can move an estimate a lot. Look for how the authors chose them and whether results are shown with and without adjustment.
Testing many outcomes or subgroups raises the chance of a result that looks significant by chance alone. Check whether the authors correct for this or label such results exploratory.
Search+ answers from the analysis section with inline citations to the supporting excerpt. It reports what the authors did and does not re-run or audit the analysis.
Statistics wording you may see, and what to ask next
| Wording you may see | What it usually signals | A follow-up question |
|---|---|---|
| "adjusted for age, sex and" | A multivariable model with covariates | Is an unadjusted result also reported, and how different is it? |
| "95% confidence interval" | The precision of an estimate | How wide is the interval for the main result? |
| "multiple imputation" | Missing values estimated from other data | How much data was missing before imputation? |
| "Bonferroni" or "false discovery rate" | A correction for multiple comparisons | Which results remain after correction? |
| "mixed-effects model" | A model for repeated or clustered data | What was treated as the clustering unit? |
| "sensitivity analysis" | A check on whether results hold under other assumptions | Did any sensitivity analysis change the conclusion? |
What are the statistical methods of a research paper?
The statistical methods are the part of a paper, usually a subsection of the methods, that describes how the data was analysed: which tests or models were used, what was adjusted for, how missing data and multiple comparisons were handled, and what threshold was used to judge results.
Statistical methods questions
Can Search+ explain the statistics used in a paper?
Will it check whether the right test was used?
Can it explain a value such as an odds ratio in plain language?
Can I compare analysis methods across studies?
Does it read equations in the paper?
Can I rely on its statistical explanations?
Know what produced the numbers
Start a workspace, upload the paper, and ask which analysis sits behind each result.
Start a workspace