See where several witnesses agree, and where their stories part
Across a set of depositions, the story of a case emerges from patterns: events every witness describes the same way, details only one witness mentions, accounts that conflict, and documents that keep coming up. Put the transcripts in one Search+ workspace, ask for recurring themes and conflicts, and then trace each theme to the testimony that supports it.
Creating an account needs no payment.
Last updated October 2026
How to find themes across depositions
- Upload every transcript for the case
Add the depositions, up to 10 per upload, naming each file after the witness so citations are easy to read. Add more in further batches as the record grows.
- Set the lens
In Workspace Context, write the questions the case turns on, such as "Track who knew about the defect, when they learned of it and what they did next." Search+ applies that lens to every question in the workspace.
- Ask for patterns, then check each one
Ask "On which events do the witnesses agree, and where do their accounts conflict?" Then ask about each conflict on its own and open the cited testimony from every witness involved.
Cross-deposition questions to ask
Which events do all the witnesses describe in the same way?
Where do the witnesses give different dates, people or sequences for the same event?
Which exhibits were shown to more than one witness, and did they describe them the same way?
Which topics did only one witness testify about?
Which witnesses say they do not recall the key meeting, and what do others say about it?
What to look for across a set of depositions
When several witnesses independently describe an event the same way, that point is easier to rely on.
Disagreements often sit in small details: a date, who was in the room, the order of events. Those details are worth tracing line by line.
Documents shown to multiple witnesses connect the testimony. Comparing how each witness reads the same exhibit is often revealing.
What a witness does not remember can matter as much as what they say, especially if another witness places them at the event.
Search+ answers across the whole workspace and cites each transcript behind a theme, so every pattern can be checked in the record.
Theme types, an example and a question
| Theme type | Example | A question to ask |
|---|---|---|
| Agreement | All witnesses place the meeting in March | Which witnesses mention the March meeting? |
| Conflict | Two witnesses name different decision makers | Who does each witness say made the decision? |
| Recurring exhibit | The same email is shown to four witnesses | How does each witness describe that email? |
| Knowledge | Some witnesses knew of the problem earlier | When does each witness say they learned of it? |
| Non-recall | Several witnesses do not recall a call | Which witnesses say they cannot remember the call? |
What theme-finding across depositions is in Search+
Finding themes across depositions means asking a question across every transcript in a workspace and reading a chat answer that groups the recurring points and cites the testimony behind each. It is a cited answer you can verify, not a coded database or a finished deposition digest.
Questions about themes across depositions
Can Search+ show where witnesses contradict each other?
Can it build a list of what every witness said about one topic?
Does it know which transcript is which?
Can I keep coming back to the same case workspace?
Is a theme summary legal advice?
See the whole record at once
Start a workspace, upload the depositions, and ask where the witnesses agree and disagree.
Start a workspace