Read a court opinion with AI and check every passage it cites
A judicial opinion mixes several things in one long text: the procedural history, the facts the court accepted, the issues, the holding, the reasoning, and sometimes concurring or dissenting opinions. Put the opinion in a Search+ workspace, ask for each of those parts in plain language, and open the cited passage to read the court's own words before you rely on a summary.
Creating an account needs no payment.
Last updated October 2026
How to read a court opinion with Search+
- Upload the opinion and the decisions it builds on
Add the opinion, whether a reporter PDF or a scanned slip opinion, along with the lower court decision or the key precedents if you have them, up to 10 files at a time. An appellate opinion often makes most sense next to the ruling it reviews.
- Set your reading purpose in Workspace Context
Write a standing instruction such as "I am researching how courts treat implied consent; separate holdings from dicta and note any dissent." Search+ applies it to every question in the workspace.
- Ask part by part and open the passages
Ask for the procedural posture, then the issues, then the holding. Each answer carries inline citations to the supporting excerpt, with a page reference when the opinion provides one, so you can read the reasoning in context.
Questions people ask about a court opinion
How did this case reach this court, and what was the decision below?
What questions did the court say it had to decide?
What did the court hold on each issue, and did it affirm, reverse or remand?
What standard of review did the court apply, and where does it say so?
Is there a dissent or concurrence, and on which point does it part ways with the majority?
Which earlier cases does the majority rely on most heavily?
What reading a court opinion well involves
Only the majority opinion states the court's decision. Concurrences agree with the result for different reasons, and dissents disagree. Ask which part of the document an answer came from.
Statements needed to decide the case carry more weight than remarks made along the way. Readers often separate the two before relying on a quotation.
Published versions may include summaries and headnotes written by an editor. They are aids, not the court's words, so check the opinion text itself.
Whether an opinion binds another court depends on the court that issued it and the jurisdiction. That analysis is for a lawyer, not a reading tool.
Archived opinions are often scans of printed pages. Search+ reads them with OCR, so check the cited passage against the original when a page is faint or marked up.
Answers cite the excerpt they rely on and include a page reference when the opinion provides one. Search+ does not invent page numbers that are not there.
The usual parts of an opinion and a question for each
| Part of the opinion | What it usually covers | A question to ask Search+ |
|---|---|---|
| Caption and syllabus | Parties, court, docket, date | Which court issued this opinion and when? |
| Procedural history | How the case got here | What did the trial court decide? |
| Facts | The facts the court accepted | Which facts did the court treat as decisive? |
| Issues | The questions presented | What issues did the court frame? |
| Analysis | Rules, precedents and their application | How did the court apply the rule to these facts? |
| Disposition | Affirmed, reversed, remanded | What did the court order at the end? |
| Separate opinions | Concurrences and dissents | What is the main argument of the dissent? |
What is a court opinion?
A court opinion is the written statement in which a court explains its decision in a case, usually setting out the facts, the issues, the applicable rules, the court's reasoning and the result.
Court opinion questions
Can Search+ find the holding in a long opinion?
Will it keep the majority separate from the dissent?
Can I read an appellate opinion together with the decision below?
Does it list the cases the court relied on?
Is this legal advice or legal research I can rely on?
Do answers ever get things wrong?
Read the court's words, not a summary of them
Start a workspace, upload the opinion, and ask for its holding and reasoning with citations.
Start a workspace